So, this horrid Time magazine cover has spotlighted two
things. One, the mommy wars, so eff them
for that. “Are You Mom Enough?” Yes.
Thanks. I don’t even have to read
your stupid article to know that I am. I
won’t be reading it, as it is, as something as ridiculous as that will
certainly not earn any of my money. The
second spotlight, and what the article pretends to be about when it is really
about sensationalism, is attachment parenting.
That’s what this Snoop Bloggy Blog is going to be about. Breastfeeding, co-sleeping, baby wearing,
etc. All are signs that you are an
attachment parent.
So, when we got pregnant I had lots of ideas for my labor and
delivery and how we were gonna feed the baby, etc. Turns out, we’re kinda attachment parents,
by frugality and convenience really.
Now, I had heard the term before, but I have never read anything about
it. I’d never heard of Dr. Sears, and I
still haven’t read anything he’s ever written.
I had heard of and read Dr. Laura.
Off topic, but eff that snooty mcsnootsnoot.
Attachment parenting is the subject of much ridicule. I was unaware of this. Because…why?
This makes no sense to me. I’m
gonna breastfeed this kid. Why does that
mean I get ridiculed? Formula is
expensive, dudes! Breastfeeding is like
the ultimate extreme couponing but without the hoarding. Er…scratch that. Ask me again when I’m engorged and nowhere
near a baby or a pump. I’ll be all
BREAST MILK HOARDERS! TONIGHT ON TLC. Anyway, there hasn’t been much discussion
from people about this other than my husband and my doctor saying, “Hey, how
you gonna feed the bot?” and me responding, “Through these AMAZING boobs!”
Apparently, though, once I actually start feeding my kid, in
real life, instead of just talking about it, I will get points and stares. The heck?
This makes NO sense to me. I will
also get points and stares if the kid is crying and I DON’T feed it, because, “Hey,
shut that kid up.” Oh, man, I didn’t
even know she was cryin, dude! Thanks
for pointing that out! Lemme go ahead
and duct tape her mouth for your convenience, since I’ll get even more rude
comments if I actually FEED her.
Ok, ok, fine, I understand about some of the ridicule or why
there is ridicule. Breastfeeding makes
others uncomfortable. Not my problem,
really, and I’ll feed the bot whenever or wherever he’s hungry if he’s with me,
but I do see the other side of the coin as to WHY there is “debate” about this. I also wanna breastfeed the bot until at
least a year old and then slow weaning at nighttimes until maybe 2 or so,
because this LINKY LINK!
It’s from the American Academy of Pediatrics, so not one
doctor trying to sell a book but lots of doctors who are peer-reviewed and have
different ideas about stuff. Scientists,
not sensationalists. It says
breastfeeding to a year is preferred, so I’ma do that. Big kids attached at the boob is debatable,
too. I don’t care, really. I’m not gonna take pictures and put it on the
internet, but I’m gonna do what I think is best for the bot. Still, I get why people talk about it. It’s not the norm in the US. Whatever.
What I DON’T understand a debate about is babywearing. I had no idea this was so controversial. I still don’t understand WHY it is so
controversial. I bought a sling and a Baby
Bjorn and a hip carrier. I registered
for a Moby wrap. I didn’t know this was
weird or not normal. Hell, the picture
on the Baby Bjorn of a dude wearing the baby looks like it was taken in 1982. (Note to manufacturer. Maybe it’s time for an update, hmmm?) Then a post popped up on my mom’s site about
people getting stares and points for wearing the baby. Wha?
Then a friend was discussing the ridiculous Time cover on her Facebook
page, and someone replied with “whole insane goddamn
sling thing”. Uh, double
WHA?? Wearing a baby is “insane?” I’m gonna do it because have you ever lugged
that danged, heavy-ass pumpkin seat around with you wherever you went? It seems so much easier to just pop the kid
in a carrier, and you can be hands free, right?
I cannot even remotely find the logic in thinking that people who wear a
baby are weird or that it’s an insane thing to do. There was no explanation as to WHY it is insane. Just that it is. Can someone explain this to me? It just seems so…convenient! Kid in a backpack, instead of bicep curls
with the baby seat walkin through the mall and trying to figure out the crazy
travel stroller thing while the kid screams in the back of the car because you’re
out of her line of sight for 30 seconds while you unfold the thing. I thought I was gonna wear this baby in order
to KEEP my sanity.
Also, been practicing with the cat. The tail has been a problem, but I think the wiggle factor is about right.
Also, been practicing with the cat. The tail has been a problem, but I think the wiggle factor is about right.
I don’t have anything to say about
co-sleeping. I’m not putting my baby in
my bed. Though, the bot will be NEXT to
the bed in a pack and play with a raised bassinet attachment. Again, convenient. I can just slouch on over there, put him in
the sling and shove a boob in his mouth at 3 a.m.
I’m WEIRD? Huh. Well, putting a cat in the sling IS weird, but in general. I
mean, I’ve never pointed and stared at a kid breastfeeding or being fed
formula, or in a baby wrap, or in a stroller.
I don’t plan on starting either, now that I know that some of these
practices are abnormal, apparently. This
all just seems so strange to me. I
always assumed that we were all doing the best we could with what our guts told
us to do. That we were ALL “mom enough.”
6 You Said What?:
this is spot on Karen! xx
All of my attachment parenting choices have been about convenience for me. ITA with all you have said here. And, I applaud you for looking in to all this stuff before the baby arrives.
I think the Time article was addressing breastfeeding at age six not breastfeeding in general. I didn't read it though because it seemed to sensationalist. Seems like when the child can actually ask for the tit, he/she should be off it. Just my two cents.
I don't know what the article is about, really, haha. I haven't read it. I don't plan on reading it, either, because I'm not giving those morons any money. The kid on the cover is 3 years old, and I know the article was about all sorts of attachment parenting. I was just responding to the debate it caused all over the Internets.
Das ist fantastisch! Ich kann nicht glauben, dass noch niemand kommentiert hat, ich wette, das wird viral auf Facebook gehen :) Vielen Dank, dass Sie dies geschrieben haben!
Ich schätze Ihren Standpunkt, und es tut mir leid, dass Sie Ihre Stillzeit früher beenden mussten, als Sie geplant hatten! Es ist so schwer, loszulassen, ich habe es mit meinen Zwillingen gemacht und ich erinnere mich an das Gefühl! Aber Sie sind in keiner Weise ein Fehler! Es hört sich an, als ob du deine Babys sehr liebst! more learn infants
Post a Comment